Skip to main content

Entry to Postmodernism

Postmodern Architecture?
In finishing my thesis, I was actually forced to learn about a thing that I had no previous experience in it. This irritating subject –but finally, I love to study it– is called Postmodernism. What is this? It sounds so cool (yeah indeed).

To define this term, I tried to read books, articles from academic journals as well as online articles. However, to my surprise, I really got no satisfying answer of what postmodernism is. It is not a simple matter to define this. It is not like defining two pluses two equals four. It is not like defining US’s current president is Barrack Obama. All literatures that I read, when it comes to definition, give ambivalent and unsatisfying definition as examples I gave to you. But at least, I want to share to you about this term with my own perspective, in a simple way.

Postmodernism surely stems from the word ‘post’ and ‘modernism’. Thus it means, ‘after modernism’ or ‘after modern’. What is then modern? Modern is not old-fashioned, that is the definition that I perceived as a layman. But bearing the status as a student, I should have provided a more satisfying definition, shouldn’t I?

Well, modernism surely stems from modern. When I cite ‘modern’ what it comes to my mind is an era. So, when did actually modern era start? Some said, it was started long long ago since the industrial revolution took place. The changing ways of producing and manufacturing goods, manual to mechanical. led to a modern era, different from traditional era. Goods were no longer produced manually from a communal work. Goods were produced by machine. Thus, modern era related closely to capitalism. It is in this era when mass culture started to emerge. Goods were produced massively. They were said to have no artistic value since they were produced by machine and once again, there were copies of product. Thus, a distinction between high art and pop art emerged. Modern era leads to modernism –spirit, thoughts, and abstract entity. So when I said about modernism, our minds will directly link to abstract conception of values existing in modern era.

So, the world witnessed various changing. Wars came after wars. New world dominant power emerged. Technology developed. And this led to revolution in every aspect of life. Culture surely changed. When culture of a society changed, surely all aspects of live changed. It is all due to the concept of culture that is cut across various aspects. As the world turned into 1980s, two greatest nations on the earth US and Soviet engaged in Cold War. This war surprisingly led to enhancement of technology. Both countries try to hack one and another in ways that people at that time could not even imagine to begin with. War indeed leads to suffering, but war can also enhance the creativity to make a revolution if not evolution of a country. Thus, computer was invented. The invention of computer definitely changed how people interacted,

A computer based society enhanced with global network, as a product of war technological enhancement, altered tremendously how people perceived information and knowledge. Thus, western society came into a state of being in the ‘crisis’ of knowledge. A crisis? Lead by revolutionary in communication skill? How come?

For long, western society was governed by the so-called meta-narratives or grand narratives as you wish to call it. What is this? Meta-narratives is ideology that becomes the basic for ,may be not only Western society but also human in general, to legitimate something. What is legitimation then? It is an act of declaring something to be right. Say, stealing is a bad thing. We perceive this something to be a wrong thing to do. Thus, religion is included to be one of meta-narratives. What are other meta-narratives? Marxism, liberalism, modernism and other ideology that tries to make a universal truth is called meta-narratives. They all try to pursue a universal claim of truth. For example, Marxism that tries to promote capitalism is the cause for all sufferings and inequalities in industrial society. They seek for a universal truth by stating capitalism as the ‘bad guy’. Thus, it is another characteristic of meta-narratives i.e. in searching a universal truth, there should be exclusion. There should be something declared as wrong. Thus, the concept of right and wrong is very clear.

This way of perceiving thing dominated Western society in pre World War II era. But after that, meta-narratives declined. They were no longer recognized as the sole entity to see the world. And this is due to the rise of communication technology.

Well, I guess my writing about postmodernism is going to be continued in my next post due to there are many things to consider. So, it is the very first part of postmodernism. It will be continued by some postmodernist thinkers and their definition of what postmodernism is. 

Comments

  1. Postmodernism is not as simple as an historical period, it is not simply an era after 'modern', many people are often perplexed by the name. It is rather a though against the idea of universal mechanism (mostly brought by science in modern era). Postmodernist believes that there is no real world, there is no real mechanism. We can not totally understand this world because our understanding is dependent upon interpretation about this world. Too, our knowledge is not objective as it is driven by many things (including media in modern times). One thing to know that such though has existed far before modern times.

    ReplyDelete
  2. if i may give the common term for "universal mechanism" ... it is called grand narrative or meta narrative ...

    I also didn't simplify my understanding of postmodernism to a historical period after modernism. I only illustrated when postmodernism term actually appeared because I agree with you in the extent of complexity about postmodernism.

    FYI, when we were in US, Fitri and I had arguments about postmodernism with Prof. Len hahaha :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hahaha...that's great, and you know the well-known 'no one knows everything about anything' which was usually preached by prof. Len is, I think, a postmodern thought. what do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nah !! that's the point where we had the arguments. Do you remember when he explained about all of that modernity stuffs?? In my opinion, what he explained was not about modernity but postmodernity. Then, after class, Fitri and I discussed it with him, why he called it as modernity instead of postmodernity.

    And do you know how he answered? He said "postmodernism is preeeeeeet (with his style) hahaha"

    He is one of supporters of scholars who consider postmodernism as silly things. But still he appreciated my thoughts, that''s what I like about that.

    I think it is because his background is Religious Studies. One of elements that is challenged by postmodernism is religion. Postmo argues that in contemporary media saturated society, religion as one example of grand narrative looses its function. I think this is the part where he called as silly :).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Most Influential Postmodernist Thinkers

This second post about postmodernism will consist of two greatest postmodernist thinkers and their contribution to postmodernism.
1. Jean Fran├žois Lyotard.
Lyotard is a French philosopher. He opened the discussion for postmodernism in social theory with his groundbreaking publication ‘La Condition Postmoderne’ (The Condition Postmodern). His works stress the decline of meta-narratives or grand-narratives, as some scholars refer it. Meta-Narratives as defined in the previous post are sets of ideas governing what is right and wrong. For example, religion defines how to live a good life. By doing so, people who do not appeal to the characteristics of good man as defined by religion will be considered unfaithful, as bad people. Lyotard argues that this way of legitimating declines in a postmodern society. What is considered good can no longer be clearly separated from what is considered bad.

The decline of meta-narratives was triggered by communication development. Traditional communicatio…

Movie Review | Stream of Tears in Wedding Dress

Last Saturday, I got a runny nose -kind of severe, as I recalled- not because of sick, but because I watched a Korean movie entitled WeddingDress.
I have frequently watched Korean movies. In my opinion, they are much better than Indonesian movies. Not that I dislike my country (I just dislike Indonesia’s movies), but yeah, Korean movies have a wide range of preference. You can watch cheesy-funny-romantic movie that make you feel happy and smile all the time. Or try to watch a horror-romanticmovie that makes you laugh and scared. You can also find cool action movie! Some movies even make me cry a lot. I really mean it when I say some Korean movies really make me cry so badly. Wedding Dress is one that makes me cry. I am a boy and I cry. So what? I don’t buy the ubiquitous saying ‘Boys don’t cry’.

Wedding Dress narrates the life of a single mother, Go-eun, played by Song Yun Ah. Her husband dies already, leaving her only with her young daughter, So-ra, nicely played by Kim Hyang-gi. …

Gender Issues in Japanese Anime and Manga

I've got this idea to write about Japan's popular culture for  some times. Firstly, I love Japan's popular culture such as anime and manga.Japan's anime and manga are so popular around the world, transcending nations, age, sex and gender. I read Japan's  manga from the age of 10 (may be), until now. I watched Japan's anime also for years.

One thing that really makes me wonder is about the depiction of gender in those popular culture product. Before furthering the discussion, it is important to say that i follow Ann Oakley's argumentation to differ sex and gender. Sex is naturally determined, while gender is socioculturally constructed. Thus, to speak of male and female is to speak of sex. While to speak of masculine and feminine is to speak of gender. In doing gender (attributing gender characteristics in body), people are for so long stereotyped by the existing binary relation. It means that male should develop masculine traits to be called as a real man.…