Skip to main content

Wikileaks in Postmodern Perspective

Last Monday, November 30, 2010, was a shocking day in the world. Nearly hundreds of thousands US bilateral documents were uploaded by wikileaks. In the leaked documents, it was uncovered that many Middle East leaders pledged US to strike Iran in response to the growing and long lasting issue of nuclear issue. As we all know. Iran insisted on developing nuclear power and it was argued that the development was for the sake of alternative energy. Iran's plan to develop nuclear in fact turned the world to be more alert. US, as one of the world leader strongly refused this plan since US surely would suspect the nuclear development used in the army enhancement. However, a surprising fact is exposed by the leaked documents i.e. the pledge by Arabian leaders to strike Iran. Surely, it makes the international relation of the countries mentioned in the documents tense. But, how is this phenomenon seen from postmodernism perspective?



Postmodernism ,as explained in the previous post, is marked by media control over society. This phenomenon surely exposes to us, how media control society? Wikileaks is a site directed by Juliane Assange, a senior Australian journalist who becomes a most wanted person in the interpol due to the leaks 3 days ago. This web is established to uncover corrupt government as well as conspiracy and monopoly.




try to look at the the logo of wikileaks on the left. The logo consist of a globe on the upper part, dominated by darkened blue. And then, underneath is form of leaks, a form resembles leaking water. And on the lower part, there is a leaked globe but it has brighter blue color as opposed to the upper globe. From this logo, we understand the aims of wikileaks. Wikileaks sees the world we are living today as a world full of conspiracy. Thus, the upper globe is given the darkened blue color. Dark is the color of doubt. According to the logo, that conspiracy that darkens the world should be exposed to make a better world. The exposure is given in the leaked form. Wikileaks then believe that a world with no secrets behind, no conspiracy behind is a very beautiful and a bright world, as represented by a bright blue globe on the lower part of the logo.


Wikileaks operates in New Media genre i.e. internet. Thus, it can be accessed anywhere, anytime and by anyone. Wikileaks in postmodern sense, represents media power over people. Thus, Wikileaks has greater power over people since it really has the power to influence people. When people know your dirtiest secret, what will you do? this question, perhaps, best describe what Wikileaks tries to do.


Another postmodern phenomenon analyzed from Wikileaks is that this site uncovers the most confidential documents. It makes people all around the world question 'who must be trusted?'. For example. this site uncovers Middle East leaders who asked US to attack Iran. Although it has been a common secret that US and Middle East leaders, in particular Arab Saudi leaders are actually 'friends' despite the tense issue of Islam and Eastern - Western ideology or whatsoever. it never crosses to my mind that Arabian leader will ask US to literally attack Iran, their neighbor country. What is in my mind before the documents were leaked is that Middle East leaders will do no harm to their own neighbor country. They live side by side and yet Arab Saudi is by far always seen as Middle East leader. This, document surely changes the way people see things, it changes the paradigm. This is surely expressed by US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton in her press conference regarding the incident as follows:


 "This disclosure is not just an attack on America's foreign policy; it is an attack on the international community, the alliances and partnerships, the conventions and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity." [1]


Her statement clearly implies her concerns about the long lasting effect of the leaks as well as the changes in the international community that is about to happen shortly. Alliances, partnerships, conventions and negotiations are usually based on mutual understanding of two partners or more. But how will international community see things as the same as before if the truth is exposed? Mutual understanding and trust are no more than empty words. Mutual understanding and trust are just the construction of reality that is represented in the news. The world which is colored by uncertainty, betrayal and ambiguity await us. People will really see things more differently that before in this postmodern world. 


Source
[1] Hillary Clinton statement as cited in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Most Influential Postmodernist Thinkers

This second post about postmodernism will consist of two greatest postmodernist thinkers and their contribution to postmodernism.
1. Jean Fran├žois Lyotard.
Lyotard is a French philosopher. He opened the discussion for postmodernism in social theory with his groundbreaking publication ‘La Condition Postmoderne’ (The Condition Postmodern). His works stress the decline of meta-narratives or grand-narratives, as some scholars refer it. Meta-Narratives as defined in the previous post are sets of ideas governing what is right and wrong. For example, religion defines how to live a good life. By doing so, people who do not appeal to the characteristics of good man as defined by religion will be considered unfaithful, as bad people. Lyotard argues that this way of legitimating declines in a postmodern society. What is considered good can no longer be clearly separated from what is considered bad.

The decline of meta-narratives was triggered by communication development. Traditional communicatio…

Movie Review | Stream of Tears in Wedding Dress

Last Saturday, I got a runny nose -kind of severe, as I recalled- not because of sick, but because I watched a Korean movie entitled WeddingDress.
I have frequently watched Korean movies. In my opinion, they are much better than Indonesian movies. Not that I dislike my country (I just dislike Indonesia’s movies), but yeah, Korean movies have a wide range of preference. You can watch cheesy-funny-romantic movie that make you feel happy and smile all the time. Or try to watch a horror-romanticmovie that makes you laugh and scared. You can also find cool action movie! Some movies even make me cry a lot. I really mean it when I say some Korean movies really make me cry so badly. Wedding Dress is one that makes me cry. I am a boy and I cry. So what? I don’t buy the ubiquitous saying ‘Boys don’t cry’.

Wedding Dress narrates the life of a single mother, Go-eun, played by Song Yun Ah. Her husband dies already, leaving her only with her young daughter, So-ra, nicely played by Kim Hyang-gi. …

Gender Issues in Japanese Anime and Manga

I've got this idea to write about Japan's popular culture for  some times. Firstly, I love Japan's popular culture such as anime and manga.Japan's anime and manga are so popular around the world, transcending nations, age, sex and gender. I read Japan's  manga from the age of 10 (may be), until now. I watched Japan's anime also for years.

One thing that really makes me wonder is about the depiction of gender in those popular culture product. Before furthering the discussion, it is important to say that i follow Ann Oakley's argumentation to differ sex and gender. Sex is naturally determined, while gender is socioculturally constructed. Thus, to speak of male and female is to speak of sex. While to speak of masculine and feminine is to speak of gender. In doing gender (attributing gender characteristics in body), people are for so long stereotyped by the existing binary relation. It means that male should develop masculine traits to be called as a real man.…