Skip to main content

Movie Review | Soekarno, unveiling the humane side of the President

Who does not know about Soekarno? He is the very first president of Indonesia. He is the one who proclaimed Indonesia’s independence. He is Indonesia’s greatest hero. He is simply great. At least, that is how I remembered Soekarno, based on the history lessons I received since elementary school.

However, apparently, that is not how Hanung Bramantyo remembered him as reflected in his latest movie, Soekarno, which narrates various stages about the life of the first president.

As a boy, Koesno Sosrodiharjo frequently falls sick more than others. Therefore, his parents decide to change his name into Soekarno, inspired by Adipati Karna, a noble character in Mahabarata narratives.

Now bearing the name of Soekarno, the boy is then sent to live with Tjokroaminoto, one of the founders of Sarekat Islam (an Islamic tradeorganization which holds an important role in Indonesian history). Through Tjokroaminoto, young Soekarno learns nationalism. However, according to the movie, Soekarno’s sense of nationalism is fully awakened after a Dutch opposed his daughter’s relationship with Soekarno.

With the flaming spirit of nationalism, Soekarno then hones his oratory skill to an astounding level. In fact, Soekarno (played by Ario Bayu, despite oppositions from Soekarno's real life children) is known as the best orator Indonesia ever has. No one in Indonesia is yet to be in his league. His political movement then starts by joining the Indonesian National (PNI) Party through which he advocates and spreads his idea of independence. He then became a famous figure.

Fearing Soekarno’s growing influence, the Dutch Collonial government arrests him and hands him imprisonment sentence in 1930, separating him from his second wife Inggit Garnasih. Soekarno and Inggit, accompanied by their adopted children, were then exiled by the Dutch Colonial government to Endebefore being transferred to Bengkulu.

Now entering his 30s, Soekarno becomes a teacher in an Islamic school in his exile in Bengkulu, incorporating his ideal of independence to his students. Among his students is Fatmawati, with whom he falls in love. Soekarno’s almost 20-year old relationship with Inggit is challenged as he grows fonder of the young girl.

Soekarno is then torn between his nation’s political conflict as Japanese invasion draws closer and his personal conflict, making Fatmawati as his second wife after Inggit. The dual conflicts set the mood for the last half of the movie which runs for a total of 137 minutes.

Despite its slow pace, the movie and Hanung as the director still deserve acknowledgement. Unlike Habibie & Ainun, Hanung’s movie on the romantic life of Indonesia’s third president, Soekarno is surprisingly fairly okay to watch. I like the way Soekarno brings audience into the old Indonesia. The setting, costumes, make-up and properties are appropriately constructed.  There are no obstructions like in Habibie & Ainun (I still remember how I detest various commercial products inserted in inappropriate manners in the move) that cause rifts in the setting of time.

Then, the movie also deserves recognition because it offers us about the unseen face of Soekarno. It is true that there have been books, articles and other resources which discussed about the human nature side of Soekarno (read: he is a heterosexual man who loves so many women). But only limited and specific number of people wanted to access them. The movie, on the other hand, appeals to more people. Movie theorists have also frequently said that movie is the best tool to promote an ideology. Therefore, this movie, in my opinion, participates in introducing Soekarno's unseen sides to broader generations. 

The unseen human side of Indonesia’s first president is constructed through various scenes that showcase Soekarno as a lady-killer. This human side of Soekarno is never narrated in Indonesia’s history subjects. Frankly, until I was at senior high school, i still naively considered Fatmawati as the only wife of Soekarno and considered that he was always faithful and madly in love with her.  Try to hit his Wikipedia entry! It states that after marrying Fatmawati, Soekarno married six more women.

Hanung, through this movie, has demystified Soekarno. The all-good image of Indonesia's founding father is brought down to earth. He is just a mere man, like the rest of us, the movie suggests. However, Soekarno is also not like the rest of us. He is Indonesia’s finding father. The movie beautifully showcases how he always holds his idealism although many people around him sound different voices.

Do my sense of nationalism increase after watching this movie? Well, I do not know for sure. But one thing I am certain is I get to know better one of the founding fathers of this country.


Score: 7/10


  1. Very nice review from you, mas Rizqi! So, from this review I assume that you don't really like Habibie and Ainun, eh? Well, uh, I know Soekarno had many wives since junior high school hahaha I feel hdirty now! Btw, long time not visiting your blog (I was directed here because you shared this link to GPlus), and I must say I like your current blog theme very much!

    1. Hai Ditaa !! Thank you for visiting my blog =)

      And yes ... i dont really like Habibie dan Ainun, too many disturbances, really bad effect (snow scenes) and bad make up, although the narration itself is pretty good (thanks to the book).

      *datang lagi ke blog saya laen kali yaa ;)*

  2. haven't watched this movie. (this kind of comment again?!!) hahaha
    well, nobody's perfect. even the founding father of Indonesia, has more than one wife - which is controversial issue in Indonesia.

    1. Thank you for dropping by Pon :)

      And I hope you will be encouraged to watch the movie hehehehe

    2. of course. i'm waiting for the movie on TV. haha


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Most Influential Postmodernist Thinkers

This second post about postmodernism will consist of two greatest postmodernist thinkers and their contribution to postmodernism.
1. Jean Fran├žois Lyotard.
Lyotard is a French philosopher. He opened the discussion for postmodernism in social theory with his groundbreaking publication ‘La Condition Postmoderne’ (The Condition Postmodern). His works stress the decline of meta-narratives or grand-narratives, as some scholars refer it. Meta-Narratives as defined in the previous post are sets of ideas governing what is right and wrong. For example, religion defines how to live a good life. By doing so, people who do not appeal to the characteristics of good man as defined by religion will be considered unfaithful, as bad people. Lyotard argues that this way of legitimating declines in a postmodern society. What is considered good can no longer be clearly separated from what is considered bad.

The decline of meta-narratives was triggered by communication development. Traditional communicatio…

Movie Review | Stream of Tears in Wedding Dress

Last Saturday, I got a runny nose -kind of severe, as I recalled- not because of sick, but because I watched a Korean movie entitled WeddingDress.
I have frequently watched Korean movies. In my opinion, they are much better than Indonesian movies. Not that I dislike my country (I just dislike Indonesia’s movies), but yeah, Korean movies have a wide range of preference. You can watch cheesy-funny-romantic movie that make you feel happy and smile all the time. Or try to watch a horror-romanticmovie that makes you laugh and scared. You can also find cool action movie! Some movies even make me cry a lot. I really mean it when I say some Korean movies really make me cry so badly. Wedding Dress is one that makes me cry. I am a boy and I cry. So what? I don’t buy the ubiquitous saying ‘Boys don’t cry’.

Wedding Dress narrates the life of a single mother, Go-eun, played by Song Yun Ah. Her husband dies already, leaving her only with her young daughter, So-ra, nicely played by Kim Hyang-gi. …

Gender Issues in Japanese Anime and Manga

I've got this idea to write about Japan's popular culture for  some times. Firstly, I love Japan's popular culture such as anime and manga.Japan's anime and manga are so popular around the world, transcending nations, age, sex and gender. I read Japan's  manga from the age of 10 (may be), until now. I watched Japan's anime also for years.

One thing that really makes me wonder is about the depiction of gender in those popular culture product. Before furthering the discussion, it is important to say that i follow Ann Oakley's argumentation to differ sex and gender. Sex is naturally determined, while gender is socioculturally constructed. Thus, to speak of male and female is to speak of sex. While to speak of masculine and feminine is to speak of gender. In doing gender (attributing gender characteristics in body), people are for so long stereotyped by the existing binary relation. It means that male should develop masculine traits to be called as a real man.…